Idea

Hello - I agree fully that the matter needs to be handled - now. I mentioned this was occurring in this forum days ago.

My issue with the blatant disregard of a policy is multi-fold

1- Does Amazon really want this type of person uploading? Amazon published specific rules yet some people do as the please and it is not caught at the upload phase.

2- When PopSockets does a random check on Amazon ,and I assure that they will as they are a small, new, rapidly growing company. I've had numerous conversations with two of their staff as I work with a client base and PopSockets are hot. They operate with a very strict set of rules and when they see PopSockets name being tossed about - we may find ourselves with a folded agreement.

3. I can appreciate your "good citizens" comment - this is more than we play by the rules. Allowing such blatant disregard - copycats, trademark infringement, manipulating the listings, inability to catch just insane uploads and wording- tragedy, Dis-ney, Mar-vel etc. etc. and now PopSockets, is just an open invite for the press to do a bit of checking and publish a non optimum article on Amazon thus lowering public trust of Amazon.

I'm glad you created the vote option as this a matter than needs to be handled now.

*crickets* from Merch.

Search something at random, eg " Beer PopSockets."

Leaving out the sponsored ones, and two with brand name "unknown" that feature the Bud Light logo (!), every single (100%) item has the word "PopSockets" in the brand name. Why aren't these being rejected?

Scott - I've asked myself the same question for 2 plus years on Merch. I cannot remotely fathom how some things get passed and online. Listings that are so clearly against policy.